Public Sector Employees

Skilled in Protecting the Unique Rights of Government Employees

Cases for public sector workers are complex, and differ from those in the private sector in several key ways, primarily due to the nature of public employment with the state, county, municipality, or other public entities. Public sector employment is governed by constitutional principles and federal statutes such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, and specific state or local government employment laws. While these employees often have additional protections under civil service laws or specific public sector statutes that provide more extensive procedural safeguards, they are also subject to differing legal standards, and applicable legal frameworks, which often require compliance with stricter timelines, especially for federal employees. Many public sector employees are unionized, and unions play a significant role in addressing claims through grievance procedures and collective bargaining agreements.

Public sector employees are faced with the need to traverse additional procedural requirements, such as timely exhausting administrative remedies with government agencies or complying with specific civil service grievance procedures, before pursuing their claims. While their rights can encompass a broader range, public sector employees are also more limited in their remedies, usually without the availability for punitive damages that are available in the private sector. Additionally, the scrutiny of public employers, and additional layers of regulations and oversight from government agencies may also support stringent decision making affecting workers that would not otherwise be justified in the private sector. Understanding these differences and having a sound strategy is crucial for effective representation of government employees, and Law and [M]ocean, APC’s attorney has expertise in the intersection of these rights and can navigate the landscape with ease.

Representative Cases

We Stand by Our Clients and Fight for Justice.

Disability discrimination and WRONGFUL MEDICAL SEPARATION

Case resolved: 2024

School district denied reasonable accommodation to long term employee who was injured on the job. The district exhausted employee’s industrial injury rights under the collective bargaining agreement and medically separated employee without engaging in the interactive process and considering an accommodation that would allow the employee to return to their regular job, or reassigning the employee.

Outcome: Financial Damages to cover employee’s wage loss and emotion distress prior to obtaining new employment.

Race Discrimination and Retaliation

Case Resolved: 2023

School district employee suffered a hostile work environment based on race and was repeatedly subjected to use of the “N” word despite her opposition. Upon complaining, the District refused to renew her contract.

Outcome: Obtained financial settlement for economic loss and emotional distress to make employee whole.

Disability discrimination and REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

Case resolved: 2022

Federal agency denied current employee reasonable accommodation for physical disability and construtively suspended his employment. Agency also rejected his applications for transfer.

Outcome: Obtained reasonable accommodation for Client through reassignment to a different position and retained his permanent employment with the federal government, with full accommodation in his new position.

Confidential Conversation
Confidential consultation

Let Us Help You Protect Yourself

At Law and [M]ocean, we are dedicated to solving your legal problems and winning your case, so we carefully select the cases we accept. If we do not believe you have a strong case, we will tell you up front and discuss alternatives for you to pursue.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Untitled*
Privacy Policy*
SMS Messages Disclaimer